Watch this space: recommended amendments to the WCRA under consideration

At least every five years, the state government of the day undertakes a review of the Workers Compensation and Rehabilitation Act (the Act). The government consults widely with an array of stakeholders to improve processes, clarify issues and introduce new ideas arising as a result of changing community standards and expectations.

The latest review has been ongoing for some time. A Draft Bill has been introduced to Parliament. A Parliamentary Committee is considering the Bill and continuing the consultation process.

Although the modern issue of workers’ compensation coverage for workers in the “gig economy” has been put aside for now, set out below are our pick of some interesting issues open for discussion in the Bill.

  1. Exempting apologies provided by an employer representative following a workplace injury being considered in any assessment of liability
    Such provisions already apply in other injury legislation although the effect of such an apology on a workplace health and safety prosecution needs to be fully considered.
  1. Appropriate qualifications of rehabilitation and return to work coordinators in larger organisations; continuation of rehabilitation after statutory benefits cease
    Rehabilitation has been an important theme in the Act over the last decade and this theme continues. 
  1. Discretion to accept a statutory claim lodged more than six months after a worker is assessed by a doctor
    There have been some recent decisions in relation to the existing section of the Act regarding whether late applications for compensation should be accepted. The Bill offers an opportunity for accepting late applications in certain circumstances.
  1. Coverage for unpaid commercial interns
    The Parliamentary Committee will examine whether underpaid interns should have access to workers’ compensation. Thought will need to be applied to the definition of “intern” so as not to include or exclude the right or wrong people.
  2. Amending the definition of psychological injury from employment being “the major significant contributing factor” to “a significant contributing factor
    This amendment may cause considerable angst to some employers giving the trending increase in claims for psychological injury. The former introduction of the word “major” into the definition of psychological injury was designed to prevent tenuous claims being accepted. If the word “major” is removed from the definition, it will be interesting to see whether more psychological claims are accepted.

As always with Bills, it is important to remember the consultation period is a moving feast and no advice can be given as to whether a Bill will in fact become law. The objective will be served if, when enacted, the law strikes a proper balance (accepted by the community) amongst all relevant stakeholders and principally workers and employers.

“The content of this publication is for reference purposes only. It is current at the date of publication. This content does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. Legal advice about your specific circumstances should always be obtained before taking any action based on this publication.”
For the latest publications and updates, click on the link below.
Scroll to Top

Book a consultation